The letter has arrived
A post-clearance audit does not stop your containers. That is exactly why importers underestimate it.
The letter typically asks for entry documents, invoices, contracts and payment records covering a period that has already closed. Nothing at the port changes. Operations continue. And then an assessment arrives covering years of shipments, because a single position applied consistently multiplies across every entry that used it.
This guide is for the CFO, finance director or import compliance manager who has to decide what happens in the next month.
General information only, not advice on a specific matter. The audit look-back period, penalty exposure and deadlines are set by law and change over time — confirm the current position with counsel against your own entry dates.
1. What an audit is, and what it is not
Clearance is a release of goods, not a final ruling on duty. A post-clearance audit revisits entries already released and tests whether the duty paid was correct.
Two consequences follow, and importers routinely miss both:
- The exposure is historic and cumulative. You are not arguing about one shipment.
- It is a documents exercise, not a goods inspection. What decides the outcome is your file, not your product.
2. Why Customs picked you
The recurring triggers:
- Declared value that sits below comparable imports of similar goods
- Classification that attracts a lower rate than the authorities consider correct
- Origin claims used to obtain preferential treatment under a trade agreement
- Related-party pricing where you buy from a parent or affiliate
- Privilege use — free-zone, bonded, BOI or duty-drawback entitlements
- Sector sweeps, where an industry is reviewed and you are simply in it
Knowing which trigger applies changes what you prepare. Do not assume; establish it from the scope of the documents requested.
3. The first 30 days
- Freeze the records. Entries, invoices, contracts, payment evidence, correspondence with the supplier and the broker, and the systems that generated them. Do not tidy anything.
- Map the entry population. Which entries, which period, which product lines, which declared positions. You cannot assess exposure without knowing the denominator.
- Appoint one internal owner and route all communication through them.
- Reconstruct the decision. Who set the classification, on what basis, and was there advice or a ruling behind it? A documented, reasoned position — even if ultimately wrong — is treated very differently from one nobody can explain.
- Take advice before answering substantive questions. Early written answers become the frame for everything afterwards.
4. How declared value is tested
The starting point is the price actually paid for the goods, but that price is subject to additions and conditions. The additions importers most often miss:
| Frequently missed | Why it surfaces in an audit |
|---|---|
| Royalties and licence fees related to the goods | Paid by a different department, treated as an IP cost, never seen as an import cost |
| Assists — tooling, moulds, materials supplied to the manufacturer | Provided free or below cost, so they never appear on any invoice |
| Freight and insurance elements | Treated inconsistently across delivery terms |
| Commissions | Buying and selling commissions are treated differently |
| Post-importation payments and rebates | Credit notes and retrospective adjustments that alter the real price |
Where the declared value is not accepted, alternative valuation methods are applied in a prescribed sequence. The practical point for a CFO: you are much better off explaining your own value than having one constructed for you.
5. Classification and origin
Classification disputes turn on the objective characteristics of the goods, not on what the product is called commercially or how your ERP labels it. Assemble the technical specifications, composition and function early, and be consistent — a description written for marketing that contradicts your declaration is a gift to the other side.
Origin claims under a trade agreement carry their own evidential burden. If you claimed preference, you need the supporting documentation to still exist, and it must match the goods actually shipped.
6. Once an assessment is issued
The sequence is: assessment → objection → appeal → Tax Court litigation. Each stage has its own deadline, and those deadlines are short and strictly applied.
The decision at each stage should be taken against three questions:
- How strong is the technical position on the merits?
- How many entries, past and future, does conceding it affect?
- What continues to accrue while the dispute runs?
That last point matters. Interest and surcharge exposure generally continues to build during a dispute, so a weak case fought slowly is the worst of both worlds. Equally, a strong case conceded for speed sets a precedent your business then lives with on every future shipment.
7. Voluntary disclosure
Correcting an error before it is found can materially improve your position, but it is not a reflex.
It tends to help where the error is discrete, historic and quantifiable — a keying error, a missed addition on a specific contract, a privilege applied to goods that did not qualify.
It tends to hurt where the underlying position is arguable, because disclosure concedes it across every entry that used it, including entries not currently under review.
8. The evidence pack
What your lawyer needs on day one:
- The audit notice and every communication received so far
- A full entry listing for the period, with declared values and classifications
- Supplier contracts, purchase orders and the invoices behind the entries
- Proof of payment, including anything paid outside the invoice
- Any royalty, licence, tooling or cost-sharing agreements with the supplier or an affiliate
- Transfer-pricing documentation where you buy from a related party
- Preferential origin documentation for any claim made
- Correspondence with your customs broker
- Any ruling, advice or precedent relied on when the position was set
Item 9 is the one that most often does not exist and most often would have helped.
9. Stopping recurrence
An audit that ends without changing anything upstream is an audit you will have again. What actually changes outcomes:
- One owner for classification decisions, with the reasoning written down
- A standing review of supplier payments that sit outside the invoice
- Alignment between transfer pricing and customs value, which are frequently managed by different teams to different logic
- A rule that new products get classified before the first shipment, not after
- Retention of import records that outlasts the look-back period
Summary
| Stage | The decision |
|---|---|
| Letter arrives | Freeze records, map the entry population, appoint one owner |
| Information requests | Take advice before substantive written answers |
| Assessment issued | Judge on the whole entry population, not on this letter |
| Objection and appeal | Weigh the merits against what accrues during the dispute |
| Afterwards | Fix the upstream process, or expect the same audit again |
The cost of an audit is set less by the original error than by how the first month is handled.
Our tax and customs team acts for foreign-invested manufacturers, importers and distributors. Initial consultation is free — call +66 92 254 2045 or send us the details. See also tax and customs services and our factory and industrial estate guide.
This guide is published by Suwanvara Law Firm — a Khon Kaen law firm established in 1986. General information only, not legal advice on a specific matter.