Skip to main content
SUWANVARA LAWFIRM
Suwanvara Law Firm Co., Ltd.
SUWANVARA LAWFIRM
SUWANVARA LAWFIRM
Suwanvara Law Firm Co., Ltd.
Foreign Investment

Who Can Bind Your Thai Company: Directors, Authorised Signatures and the Affidavit

In Thailand the question of who may sign for a company has a documentary answer, and counterparties check it. How authorised-director wording works, why the company affidavit matters more than a job title, and where foreign parents lose control without noticing.

by Legal Advisory TeamAugust 22, 20263 min read
Who Can Bind Your Thai Company: Directors, Authorised Signatures and the Affidavit

In many jurisdictions the question "who can sign for the company" is answered by a job title and an internal delegation policy. In Thailand it has a documentary answer that outsiders check: the company affidavit, showing which directors may sign and in what combination.

Foreign parents that skip this end up in one of two situations — a contract whose validity is arguable, or a local director who can bind the company alone while the parent believed otherwise.

The registered signature arrangement

When a Thai company is registered, its authorised signature arrangement is registered with it. It might require one named director signing alone, any two directors signing jointly, or a specific director together with one other — with or without the company seal.

That arrangement is not internal housekeeping. It is what appears on the affidavit, and it is what a bank, a landlord, a customer or a court will rely on.

Two consequences follow immediately:

  • A signature outside the arrangement creates an argument, whatever the signer's title
  • The arrangement is a control mechanism, and it is one of the few that operates without the parent being present

The affidavit

The company affidavit is the certified extract of registered particulars: directors, signing arrangement, registered capital, registered address, objectives. It gets requested constantly — bank onboarding, leases, supply agreements, tenders, litigation.

Because it reflects what is registered rather than what is true internally, it is where governance drift becomes visible. Directors who resigned but were never deregistered. An address the company left two years ago. Objectives that do not cover what the business now does.

Check it once a year against reality. It takes an hour and prevents the category of problem that surfaces mid-transaction.

Powers of attorney

Where someone other than an authorised director needs to act — a manager attending a government office, a lawyer filing something, an employee collecting documents — the instrument is a power of attorney, granted by whoever has authority to grant it.

Practical points that catch foreign parents:

  • The power should be specific to the task; broad open-ended authority is both risky internally and often unhelpful in practice
  • Some offices require the power on their own form, and will not accept a general one
  • A power granted by a person who did not have authority to grant it is worth nothing, which loops back to the signature arrangement
  • Powers executed abroad usually need certification and translation before they are usable here

Where control quietly leaks

The single-signature local director. Convenient during setup, then never revisited. The parent's control depends on goodwill rather than on the registered arrangement.

The unregistered change. A director leaves, an address changes, capital is increased. The internal record moves; the registered record does not.

The manager who has always signed. Years of contracts executed by someone outside the arrangement. Nobody objected because nothing went wrong — until one counterparty had a reason to look.

The seal nobody can find. Where the registered arrangement requires it, a missing seal stops a signing.

Objectives that no longer describe the business. Which becomes an issue exactly when a bank or a licensing authority compares what you do to what you registered.

A short annual check

  1. Pull a current affidavit and read it against reality
  2. Confirm every director listed is still a director, and every actual director is listed
  3. Confirm the signature arrangement still matches how the parent intends to keep control
  4. Confirm the registered address is where correspondence will actually be received
  5. Confirm the registered objectives cover current activities
  6. Review outstanding powers of attorney and revoke the ones that have outlived their purpose

📌 See more: business law services · civil litigation

If you are unsure who can currently bind your Thai company, or want the signature arrangement changed to reflect how the group actually governs it, talk to our team.

Related: business contract checklist · structuring your Thai subsidiary

Frequently asked questions

Our country manager signs everything. Is that valid in Thailand?+

Only if the company's registered signing arrangement supports it, or the manager holds a properly granted power of attorney for that class of transaction. A job title, however senior, does not by itself give authority to bind a Thai company. Counterparties, banks and government offices check the company affidavit to see which directors may sign and in what combination. A contract signed by someone outside that arrangement creates an argument about validity precisely when you least want one.

What is the company affidavit and why does everyone ask for it?+

It is the certified extract of the company's registered particulars — directors, authorised signature arrangement, registered capital, address and objectives. It is the document counterparties rely on to confirm who may sign, and it is requested for almost every significant transaction: bank onboarding, leases, supply agreements, litigation. Because it reflects what is registered rather than what is true internally, any gap between your actual governance and your registered particulars shows up here first.

Can a foreign parent keep control without putting its people on the board?+

Partly, through the shareholders' rights, the articles, and the signature arrangement itself — for example by requiring two signatures including one nominated by the parent. What does not work is relying on informal understandings while the registered arrangement lets a single local director sign alone. If the registered position and the intended position differ, the registered position is what a counterparty relies on, and it is the one that will govern the dispute.

A director resigned months ago but is still on the affidavit. Does it matter?+

Yes. Until the change is registered, the public record still shows that person as a director with the registered signing power. That creates two problems at once: a person who has left may still appear able to bind the company to a counterparty relying on the record, and the company's own filings are inaccurate. Registered particulars are not an internal formality — they are what everyone outside the company acts on.

Do we still need a company seal?+

Whether a seal is required depends on the registered signature arrangement — the affidavit states whether the authorised signature must be accompanied by the company seal. Where it is required and it is omitted, the execution can be challenged. Foreign parents unfamiliar with seals often treat it as decorative and keep it in a drawer that nobody can find on signing day, which is a small problem that stops a closing.

Share articleFacebookLINEX