Skip to main content
SUWANVARA LAWFIRM
Suwanvara Law Firm Co., Ltd.
SUWANVARA LAWFIRM
SUWANVARA LAWFIRM
Suwanvara Law Firm Co., Ltd.
Our Service

Arbitration & Mediation Lawyers in Thailand

The question is not whether you could win — it is what winning would cost and how long it would take

Alternative Dispute Resolution
Our Services

The question is not whether you could win — it is what winning would cost and how long it would take

Litigation is one way to resolve a dispute, not the only one, and often not the best one. Where a commercial relationship still has value, where the amount does not justify years of proceedings, or where the other side's ability to pay is uncertain, a negotiated outcome is frequently worth more than a judgment. We advise on that choice honestly — including when to litigate — and represent clients in mediation and arbitration. We also draft the dispute-resolution clauses that decide, long in advance, which of these routes is even available.

Service Scope

Assessing whether to negotiate, mediate, arbitrate or litigate
Representation in mediation, including court-annexed mediation
Arbitration under institutional and ad hoc rules
Drafting dispute-resolution, governing-law and escalation clauses
Settlement agreements drafted to be enforceable
Pre-action negotiation and structured payment arrangements

Deciding between routes on the facts, not by instinct

The considerations are practical: how much is at stake against what the process costs, whether the relationship needs to survive, how much of your evidence you are willing to put into a public record, and — most decisive of all — whether the other side could satisfy a judgment. A claim against a counterparty with nothing to enforce against is worth resolving now on terms rather than perfectly in two years against an empty defendant.

A settlement is only as good as its drafting

Agreeing figures in a room is the easy part. What determines whether a settlement holds is how it is documented: what exactly is being released, when payment falls due, what happens on default, and whether the agreement can be enforced without starting the original dispute over again. Settlements drafted loosely have a way of producing a second dispute about the terms of the first.

The clause you write today decides your options later

Whether arbitration is available, where it would be seated, under whose rules, and whether mediation must be attempted first are all fixed by a clause agreed when everyone is still cooperative. Clauses copied between contracts without thought regularly point at forums that make no sense for the parties involved. It is a small piece of drafting with a disproportionate effect on what happens years later.

Talk to an Attorney

Over 40 years of distinguished practice — let our team review your matter.

40+
Years
1.2k+
Cases
92%
Satisfied

Frequently asked questions about Alternative Dispute Resolution

13 questions answered

TAI, THAC, and TBAC are most common. TAI (general), THAC (international), TBAC (construction).
Upfront fees are higher, but cases conclude in 6-12 months — lowering total cost. Awards are enforceable in 160+ countries.
Yes — every Thai court has a mediation center. Over 60% of cases settle through mediation, at low or no cost.
Each party nominates one; the two nominees pick a third — or the institution appoints if parties cannot agree.
File a petition with the Civil Court for enforcement — typically 1-3 months absent grounds-based objection.
Fees depend on the matter's nature and complexity. We always provide a clear written quote before starting. Initial consultation is free — call +66 92 254 2045.
No — initial phone, email, or LINE consultations are free, so you can assess your situation before committing.
It depends on the matter type. We provide a clear timeline at the outset and regular progress updates.
Yes — we litigate in any court across Thailand, with international partners for cross-border matters.
Yes. Our team works in Thai, English, and Mandarin Chinese — well-suited for foreign investors and international clients.
Not automatically. It can be faster and more private, and it may suit a cross-border relationship better, but it carries its own costs. Which is preferable depends on the amount at stake, the parties, and what the contract already provides for.
Not in itself. Mediation is an attempt to resolve matters, and what is said in it is treated differently from evidence. It is worth going in with a clear view of what an alternative outcome would realistically be worth, so any offer can be measured against something.
Usually not. What matters is what exactly is being released, when payment falls due, what happens on default, and whether it can be enforced without relitigating the original dispute. Documenting that properly is what stops a settlement becoming the next argument.